Density of collective housing by bringing identity of the individual one.
When it comes to housing, one of the main problems people are facing in most urban areas today, often places of constant growth and raising housing demands, is a need to choose an apartment typology over single-family houses not because of their desire, but out of necessity.
Global Design & Architecture Design Awards 2019
First Award | Category: Housing (Upto 5 Floors) (Built)
Studio: Metaform Architects
Country: Luxembourg
Their main concerns can be summed up as following:
- Typically, in people’s minds residential buildings often imply ‘a life in a box’, without living quality, feeling of belonging and identity; a lack of natural light and a view;
2. Proximity to the neighbors resulting in the lack of privacy, both visual and acoustic
3. The insufficient physical space in various forms for a life of comfort.
In our approach, the idea was to carefully analyze these issues and respond by using them as a base point of transformation into resources, and furthermore into qualities, thus bringing a new vision of a collective housing typology.
According to the municipal building regulations and consent, regardless of the peculiar topography, a priori we would have been allowed to design a simple single-block building, with a 2-story flat basement. However, the surrounding context, specific terrain conditions and form of the plot offered a possibility for different experiment, while at the same time reflecting and responding to the named issues:
- The plot is situated along a particularly curved street, a very steep topography with 10 meters of difference in height and a preservation of three-century-old trees, classified as national monuments – all of these conditioned the initial shape of the building. Furthermore, the building responds to the specific urban context (small-scaled housing units on one side and large-scale apartment block on the other): it creates a subtle transition by splitting the main volume into six smaller, vertically shifted blocks. In this way, the building is adjusting to its surroundings; it preserves the required density, while nurturing the feeling of belonging, identity, human scale.
Volume splitting and shifting have been carefully studied to respond to a need for natural light, opening the panoramic views towards the landscape and the city and creating the visual contact with the sky, while at the same time allowing for the residents’ privacy.
2. Another response to the privacy issues consists of enhancing the vertical communication, while eliminating long horizontal, often dark and acoustically unfavorable corridors. Three vertical cores connect underground parking directly to the apartments. This solution allowed for the transversal apartment configurations with three-side orientation.
On the other side, our idea was to, apart from offering a privacy when needed, give residents a possibility to meet and get to know each other in a common shared indoor space. The facilities such as common kitchen, leisure room, games – are all designed and intended to bring value by improving social interaction and a sense of community living, on individual voluntary bases, while preserving the privacy and peace of others.
3. Apart from creating the meeting common space that can accommodate common as well as private gatherings, the underground floors offer of a spacious storage for every apartment.
Our overall aspiration was to ‘marry’ current housing needs and issues with specific conditions of the site; to design a collective housing building that offers people a sense of belonging, identity and community.
